The political logics of patronage: Uses and abuses of government jobs in Brazil

The political appointment of bureaucrats (or patronage, for short) is a major resource for politicians all around the world. Scholars have long studied patronage, often seeing it as a clientelistic strategy whereby bureaucracies are staffed with supporters to retain political power, resulting in bureaucrats who work less and public services that fail to fulfill citizens' needs. Building on my dissertation (which won APSA’s 2021 Harold D. Lasswell Award for best dissertation in public policy, among other awards), this book project expands our understanding of patronage by distinguishing five distinct rationales that drive politicians' use of government jobs.

The five political logics of patronage that I identify are: managing bureaucrats (to deliver public services or to extract rents), mobilizing voters, rewarding supporters, tying the opponent’s hands, and anchoring coalitions. Each of these political logics of patronage has a different rationale, distinct employment patterns, and divergent effects on governance and service delivery – not all of them negative.

Empirically, I document the logics of patronage with data on Brazilian municipal governments, a particularly useful context to study patronage given its wide variation in political and economic development and the coexistence of patronage with civil service and other strong anti-corruption institutions. To illustrate the diverse uses of patronage and their consequences I combine administrative microdata (including contract-level, identified data on the universe of municipal employees, and data on the performance of education and healthcare bureaucracies), two original surveys in one state (a face-to-face representative survey of 926 bureaucrats, and an online survey of 755 local politicians), and 121 in-depth interviews with bureaucrats, politicians, and anti-corruption agents done over 18 months of fieldwork in 7 states.

Three novel implications emerge from this project. First, patronage can alleviate agency problems and thus enhance the accountability and effectiveness of bureaucrats, not only to extract rents but also to deliver public services. Second, when politicians use patronage to extract rents, they mobilize a diverse set of strategies that go beyond the hiring of supporters, including the hiring of civil service bureaucrats and the firing (not just hiring) of temporaries. Third, policies commonly used to reduce patronage –such as civil service regimes, legal constraints on hiring, and elections for key bureaucratic positions– can have undesirable consequences, partly because of politicians’ strategic responses to constraints imposed on their hiring discretion. These findings are relevant to scholars and policymakers seeking to understand and to improve governance and state capacity, especially in middle-income contexts.

IE University (Madrid, Spain)

• Government and Comparative Politics (undergraduate). Spring 2023.
• Public Policy Analysis (undergraduate). Fall 2022. Teaching evaluation by students: 4.4 out of 5.

Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN, USA)

• Research Design (graduate). Spring 2022. Teaching evaluation by students: 4.5 out of 5.
• Political Economy of Corruption (undergraduate). Fall 2021 and Fall 2020. Teaching evaluation by students: 4.9 out of 5 (2020) and 4.4 out of 5 (2021).
• Political Economy of Development (undergraduate). Spring 2021. Teaching evaluation by students: 4.8 out of 5.
• Politics of Bureaucracies (graduate). Spring 2021. Teaching evaluation by students: 4.2 out of 5.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, MA, USA)

• Machine Learning and Data Science in Politics (undergraduate). Spring 2020. Teaching Assistant for In Song Kim. Because of the pandemic, MIT did no teaching evaluations.
• Making Public Policy (undergraduate). Fall 2019. Teaching Assistant for Karilyn Crockett. Teaching evaluation by students: 6.3 out of 7.
• Political Science Laboratory (undergraduate). Spring 2019. Co-instructor with Benjamin Morse. Teaching evaluation by students: 6.6 out of 7.
• Quantitative Research Methods I (graduate). Fall 2017. Teaching Assistant for Daniel Hidalgo. Teaching evaluation by students: 6.5 out of 7.
• LaTeX workshop. September 2017. Co-instructor with Weihuang Wong.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (Natal, RN, Brazil)

• Experimental and Quasi-experimental Evaluation of Public Policy (in Portuguese). June 2019. Teaching evaluation by students: 9.5 out of 10.

USP-IPSA Summer School in Methods in Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations (Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil)

• Advanced Issues in Quantitative Methods for Public Policy Analysis. January 2019. Teaching Assistant for Bruno Cautres.

Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) (Cambridge, MA, USA)

• Evaluation of Social Programs. June 2017. Teaching Assistant for J-PAL’s flagship executive education course.

Guest lectures

• Guest lecture on political cycles in the Master of Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government. November 2021.
• Guest lecture on fieldwork in the Master in Social Sciences of the Carlos III-Juan March Institute. October 2021.
• Guest lecture in the course Representation and Accountability (taught by Kristin Michelitch at Vanderbilt University). October 2021.
• Guest lecture in the course Introduction to Comparative Politics (taught by Noam Lupu at Vanderbilt University). November 2020.
• Guest lecture in the course Corruption: Finding it and Fixing it (taught by Jeeyang Rhee Baum at Harvard University). November 2019.